CryptoEdgeExplorerslab notes by Ξmars
Claim testFAIL

Do monthly dividend stocks yielding about 7% pay off?

Short answer: Over ten years, the 13 monthly dividend stocks on Binance Stocks returned 8.1% a year with dividends reinvested, against 12.4% for a plain dividend ETF and 15.3% for the S&P 500. 7 of the 13 cut their dividend at least once, and the highest yields did worst.

Published 2026-10-26Data: October 2016 to September 2026, monthly total returns and dividend history, every monthly payer listed on Binance StocksBy Ξmars

A free report arrived by email: seven stocks that “pay you every single month”, ranked from safest to highest yield, averaging about 7%. Monthly checks sound like a salary. The question is whether these stocks actually pay off as an investment.

How we tested

  • The rule was written and timestamped before any price or dividend data was pulled.
  • Universe, chosen mechanically: every stock on Binance Stocks worth at least USD 1 billion that paid 12 or more dividends in each of 2023, 2024 and 2025. That gave 13 names.
  • Total return with dividends reinvested, equal weight, rebalanced yearly, from October 2016 to September 2026, against SCHD (a plain US dividend ETF) and VOO (S&P 500).
  • A dividend cut: a year in which total dividends per share fell more than 10%.
  • Pass rule: return within 1 point a year of SCHD, and fewer than a quarter of the names cutting.

Results

Basket Return per year Names with a dividend cut
All 13 monthly payers 8.1% 7 of 13
The report’s seven 6.7% 4 of 7
SCHD, plain dividend ETF 12.4%
VOO, S&P 500 15.3%

The monthly payers trailed the plain dividend ETF by more than 4 points a year. Over ten years that is the difference between $100 growing to about $218 and to about $323.

Higher yield, worse outcome

Yield today Return per year Names with a cut
3.5% to 5.3% 7.7% none
5.9% to 7.1% 10.9% 3 of 4
7.9% to 20.8% 5.3% 4 of 5

The stock with the highest yield, about 21%, lost 7% a year over the decade and cut its dividend in four separate years. A high yield is often the market pricing in the next cut.

The “safest” names behaved as promised on the payment side: the one with a 674-month record never cut. Its total return was 3.0% a year.

How the offer works

The report itself was the smaller story. One click in the email signed the reader up to a new daily newsletter without asking. The next page showed more reports; the button to take one was large and coloured, the way out a small grey underlined link. The reader’s email address appeared in the page address, where tracking scripts on the page can read it. A text-message alert sign-up followed in the welcome email. Each “free report” is a sign-up for another list.

Limits

  • Only stocks that still trade today could enter, so failed monthly payers are missing and the real picture is likely worse.
  • Taxes are not modelled. For readers outside the US, withholding tax takes a share of every dividend before it arrives.
  • A “cut” counts special dividends. One lender’s 2020 cut was a pause in its extra payouts while its regular monthly dividend continued; without it, half of the names still cut.
  • Two data problems were fixed before scoring, with the rule unchanged: dividend records missing on long date ranges, and a listing-day price jump caused by a reverse split.

Verdict

FAIL. Paying monthly changes when the money arrives; it does not add to it. These stocks paid less in total and cut more often than a plain dividend ETF, and the highest yields were the least reliable. Not financial advice.